So, Fujifilm have a shiny new hybrid camera in their mini range- The Instax Evo. I was so keen to get this camera I took the plunge and ordered from Amazon Japan. It is due to be released in the USA and Europe in February 2022. It cost me £185 after import fees. I do recommend you wait for February because you will be missing the warranty if you buy from Japan and the app has not yet been officially released in many regions.
You can find my video review here: Instax Evo Mini Hands on Review - YouTube
A comparison between the Evo and Liplay video here: Instax Mini Evo Vs LiPlay Fuji Hybrid Cameras Comparison - YouTube
On paper it seems similar to the LiPlay, so how about we directly compare the two, and whilst we are at it include the Instax Square hybrids cameras the SQ10 and SQ20...
Specs
|
Instax Mini Evo |
Instax Mini LiPlay |
SQ10 (Square) |
SQ20 (Square) |
|
Sensor |
1/5-in |
1/5-in |
¼-in |
1/5-in |
|
Effective
pixels |
2560 × 1920 |
2560 × 1920 |
1920 x 1920 |
1920 x 1920 |
|
Flash
Effective Range |
50 cm to 1.5
m LED |
50 cm to 1.5
m LED |
Auto/Compulsory
flash/Suppressed flash/Slow synchro/Red-eye removal Effective range: Approx. 50 cm to 8 m |
Auto/Compulsory
flash/Suppressed flash Effective
range: Approx. 50 cm to 2 m |
|
Sensitivity |
ISO100 to
1600 (automatic switching) |
ISO 100 to
1600 (Auto) |
ISO 100 to
1600 (Auto) |
ISO 100 to
1600 (Auto) |
|
Aperture |
F2.0 |
F2.0 |
F2.4 |
F2.4 |
|
Shutter
Speed
|
1/8000 to 1/4 second |
1/8000 to 1/4 second |
1/29500 sec.
to 1/2 sec. (Auto), maximum 10 sec. in Bulb mode |
1/7500 sec.
to 1/2 sec. (Auto), maximum 10 sec. in Bulb mode |
|
Focal
length |
f = 28 mm
(35-mm film equivalent) |
f = 28
mm (35 mm film equivalent) |
28.5mm |
33.4 mm |
|
Focus
range |
10 cm to ∞ |
10 cm to ∞ |
10 cm to ∞ |
10 cm to ∞ |
|
LCD |
3.0-inch TFT,
460,000 dots |
2.7-inch TFT,
230,000 dots |
3 in TFT
Colour LCD Monitor (Approx. 460k-dots) |
2.7-in. (6.9 cm) TFT colour
LCD monitor, Pixels: Approx. 230k-dots |
|
Filters |
10 lens
effects, 10 film effects, 100 possible combinations |
6 filters, 10
frames |
6 Partial colour (Red / Orange / Yellow / Green / Blue / Purple), plus10 Filters, Brightness adjustment, Vignette |
For still & video: 6 Partial colour (Red / Orange / Yellow / Green / Blue / Purple), plus 10 filters, Brightness adjustment, Vignette Plus 2 dedicated filters to still images and 3 dedicated to video. |
|
Print
resolution |
25 dots / mm x 12.5 dots/ mm (635 x 318 dpi, 40 x 80 μm dot pitch) 12.5 dots / mm when printed from smartphone app (318 dpi, 80 μm dot pitch) |
12.5 dots/mm
(318 dpi, 80 μm dot pitch) |
12.5 dots/mm
(318 dpi, 80 µm dot pitch |
12.5 dots/mm
(318 dpi, 80 μm dot pitch) |
|
Battery
Life & Type |
Approximately
100, Built-in |
Approximately
100, Built-in |
Approx. 160
prints, removable |
Approx. 100
prints, built in |
|
Digital
Zoom |
Yes |
Yes |
2.4x |
Up to 4 X in
shooting/printing |
|
Shooting
modes |
Standard,
Double Exposure |
Standard |
Standard,
Double Exposure, Bulb |
Standard,
Double exposure, Bulb mode, Split, Collage, Time Shift Collage |
|
Dimensions |
87 mm x 122.9
mm x 36 mm |
82.5 mm ×
122.9 mm × 36.7 mm |
H12.7 x W11.9
x D4.7cm |
119 mm x 50
mm x 127 mm/ |
|
Weight |
285 g |
255 g |
450g
(includes film pack and battery) 400g (without
film) |
440 g/15.5 oz. (including film pack). 390 g (without film) |
|
Tripod? |
Y |
N |
Y |
N |
They have tried to go for an analogue look with the Evo, which looks great but
not is all as it seems. The camera itself is all plastic made to look like
metal and leather. Take a look of the Evo compared to my much-loved Rollei 35mm
analogue camera, you can see they tried to replicate some of the original analogue
features such as the print lever made to look like a film advance lever and the selfie mirror made to look like a view
finder.
Well at least they have brought back the tripod hole that was missing in both the LiPlay and SQ20, unfortunately they have lost the bulb function that oddly was available on the tripodless SQ20.
In many ways the Evo is much like a tarted up LiPlay, with much the same lens and sensor. The main difference of course is the addition of many more filters which are easily accessed via a clicky turny knob for the film effects and the turning lens ring for the lens effects. I do miss some of the filters that were on both the SQ10 and SQ20, especially the partial colour filters. I loved being able to only see one colour and the rest being black and white.
Lens filter vignette film filter normal
Lens filter vignette film filter vivid
Lens filter vignette film filter monochrome
This brings me on nicely to the main differences with the square hybrid cameras filters and those seen on LiPlay and Evo. With the LiPlay and Evo you select the filter before taking the picture, and the picture is saved with that filter applied. With the Evo there are 100 different combinations. In comparison with the SQ10 and SQ20 the image is saved without filters, but you can apply different ones after you take the image making it it better for playing around with different filters before printing. The main drawback with the Evo’s filters is not being able to change the filter after taking the image, as well as the time it takes to scroll through the options . The Evo tries to help by allowing you to save your favourite combinations as a pre-set, you can save up to 3 different combinations.
Lens filter vignette film filter blue
Lens filter vignette film filter red
Lens filter vignette film filter yellow
Lens double exposure film filter normal
The main advantage of both the Evo and LiPlay is the ability to
use the camera as a Bluetooth printer with your phone. The app like the LiPlay's version is really easy to use. Interestingly despite
the print resolution being higher for the Evo for images printed directly from the
camera, this does not happen with images printed from the phone, which matches
the LiPlay’s lower resolution. One way around this is to upload images directly to your cameras SD card. This can be fiddly, because you need to have a file name with 4 letters and 4 numbers (e.g. ABCD1234) and needs to be a jpeg. I'm not sure if it's worth doing though, as you may not notice much of a difference.
It also trumps the LiPlay in terms of looks and the screen, which has twice the resolution making it easier to view what your image and filters will look like. I have noticed images can appear brighter on the screen compared to reality, plus the view changes at certain angles so not always consistent. The LiPlay's lower resolution was also a major drawback of the SQ20 from the SQ10, which had the same poor 230k dot resolution.
As with the LiPlay there are limitation of what a pretty basic sensor can achieve. Sometimes contrast can lead to loss of details, especially in shadows or direct sun light. Your phone is much more likely to take better images, but the way to look at the digital side of the camera is purely a printing guide to print on a small film, so won’t win you any awards based purely on their digital image. I see the digital images just as a back up to the physical images themselves and to decide what to and what not to print, important considering the cost of films. There is still something to be said for Instax’s analogue range, especially the Instax Mini Neo and SQ6 which allow you to experiment and offer the element of surprise of whether your picture is what you imagined. This of course is more expensive due to more film wastage, but that’s the part of instant films charm and the challenge. For this reason, analogue instant cameras mean you are more likely to take more considered images.
Lens filter mirror film filter normal
Lens filter mirror film filter vivid
Lens filter light leak film filter vivid
Lens filter vignette film filter vivid
Lens filter normal, film filter monochrome
I remember when I first got the SQ10 being disappointed with the image quality but liked the ability to apply some interesting filters. In many ways the SQ10 has the best sensor despite being the eldest in the line-up. Although the others are all based on the original SQ10 sensor, the sensor size has been reduced and the flash was moved from a decent traditional flash to low powered LED flashes that have a much shorter range. Considering the sensor size light is important so don’t expect great indoor images. However, there is a solution for the Evo with the welcomed addition of a cold shoe mount. You can add a stronger LED to improve your indoor images and avoid those noisy high ISO images. Please note it;s not a hot shoe mount, so you can't have a synchronised flash only continuous LED light.
Overall, I think the EVO Instax is a worthy upgrade of the LiPlay. I was a little disappointed with the lack of improvement of the sensor. I Like the
cold shoe and how the camera looks despite being plastic. I like the big clear
screen and the many filters. I miss bulb mode and some of the filters that
featured on the SQ10/20, but you can’t have it all! Fingers crossed for a wide
hybrid camera maybe??
Lens filter vignette film filter monochrome
Lens filter fisheye film filter vivid
Lens filter vignette film filter monochrome
Lens filter half frame film filter vivid



Excellent, this was just what I was looking for. Currently use a Mini 70 and SQ6 and thinking of getting the Evo.
ReplyDeleteThank you for this!
Mark
OneCameraOneLens